Very often, legislators and regulators create rules and regulations using a linear mindset. They claim they understand the issues, they even have public hearings to prove it. However, the people who can attend such things are often lawyers and losers. Losers because anyone in the market who was winning has no time to introduce themselves, they are too busy producing and participating in their respective industries. So they hire attorneys to come forward and talk to the regulators. Those attorneys who don’t have actual clients of any value also come forward because they know that by sleeping with regulators and putting in a little effort, they can get the occasional scoop on the process and a little juice. This can help them get good corporate clients and make a lot of money. All these scoundrels, I mean, lawyers have to do is promise jobs to regulators when they get tired of red tape.
I realize that this is not news to anyone. But we are making many mistakes in our rush to regulate business, as it destroys free enterprise. Let’s take the most recent legislation proposed by the FTC, Federal Trade Commission for franchise rule. Too often we are creating rules that are out of control with the changing and evolving business model of franchises and expecting complaints from defaulting and renegade franchisees on the FTC’s online complaint internet form is not what I would call experience of law enforcement how they do it. He graciously pointed out in his franchise report recently.
Presenting cases, with manipulated statements made by persuaded people to embellish complaints due to promised monetary settlements, is it not enforcing the law? That is criminal, it is called lying, it should not be considered police, it is more like the mafia, where they shoot down those who oppose them and then use them as an example. Shouldn’t we have an internal investigation into these manipulations and what I call fraud within the Federal Trade Commission? Targeting a potential case and then notifying about 70 different agencies from various jurisdictions in the US, Canada, and abroad and putting a business on a “watch list” is not law enforcement, that’s harassment. . Deliberately calling, emailing and contacting a business or individuals based on competitor complaints to catch is not law enforcement. I think Adam Smith might have a better definition than me, maybe even Karl Marx wants to have an opinion.
Bringing cases in secret court and freezing the assets of an ongoing business to starve a business to win a bad case is not law enforcement, it is a malicious abuse of power. I can prove that all of this is happening. None of whom I would consider law enforcement experience. This must stop now. These are the unintended consequences of unnecessary regulations and abuse of power where corruption is guaranteed by the absolute power of owning a box that the industry has been shoved into by regulators who have never had to write a paycheck or the legislators who got their money lying through those grinning whites. teeth covered under an elegant wig.
Why do we let the government do that? And why do we allow small departments in big bureaucracies to stifle free enterprise and pretend they are doing more than helping their future employers as the revolving door goes round and round? The only real evil in our world today is the leaking bureaucracy? Think about this, I will answer you.